Hopes that manufacturing could build on the momentum established at the turn of the year have been dashed by a decline in the rate of output growth.

In order to do so, we have agreed to remove certain sensitive information from our search results. We know that many people are upset about this decision, and frankly, we understand their point of view.

In deciding how best to approach the Chinese - or any - market, we must balance our commitments to satisfy the interests of users, expand access to information, and respond to local conditions.

It's a lot of money for smaller companies to pay. We'd like to see smaller companies participate.

As we develop a greater understanding of the Chinese market, we intend to add more products and services.

This is not, to be sure, a tremendous advance in transparency to users, but it is at least a meaningful step in the right direction.

As a U.S.-based company that deals primarily in information, we have urged the United States government to treat censorship as a barrier to trade. There's an important role for the United States government to address, in the context of its bilateral government-to-government relationships, the larger issues of free expression, and open communication.

The nascent recovery in domestic demand is neither strong enough to warrant an immediate reversal of the August cut, nor weak enough to prompt back-to-back rate cuts.

We don't want to risk becoming irrelevant or useless due to the way that our content is blocked or filtered currently.

The real work of domain name system happens in a very distributed, very decentralized way,